Showing posts with label Software Testing Tutorial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Software Testing Tutorial. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 May 2014

Software Testing Documentation

Post By: Hanan Mannan
Contact Number: Pak (+92)-321-59-95-634
-------------------------------------------------------

Software Testing Documentation

Testing documentation involves the documentation of artifacts which should be developed before or during the testing of Software.
Documentation for Software testing helps in estimating the testing effort required, test coverage, requirement tracking/tracing etc. This section includes the description of some commonly used documented artifacts related to Software testing such as:
  • Test Plan
  • Test Scenario
  • Test Case
  • Traceability Matrix

Test Plan

A test plan outlines the strategy that will be used to test an application, the resources that will be used, the test environment in which testing will be performed, the limitations of the testing and the schedule of testing activities. Typically the Quality Assurance Team Lead will be responsible for writing a Test Plan.
A test plan will include the following.
  • Introduction to the Test Plan document
  • Assumptions when testing the application
  • List of test cases included in Testing the application
  • List of features to be tested
  • What sort of Approach to use when testing the software
  • List of Deliverables that need to be tested
  • The resources allocated for testing the application
  • Any Risks involved during the testing process
  • A Schedule of tasks and milestones as testing is started

Test Scenario

A one line statement that tells what area in the application will be tested. Test Scenarios are used to ensure that all process flows are tested from end to end. A particular area of an application can have as little as one test scenario to a few hundred scenarios depending on the magnitude and complexity of the application.
The term test scenario and test cases are used interchangeably however the main difference being that test scenarios has several steps however test cases have a single step. When viewed from this perspective test scenarios are test cases, but they include several test cases and the sequence that they should be executed. Apart from this, each test is dependent on the output from the previous test.
Test Scenarios

Test Case

Test cases involve the set of steps, conditions and inputs which can be used while performing the testing tasks. The main intent of this activity is to ensure whether the Software Passes or Fails in terms of its functionality and other aspects. There are many types of test cases like: functional, negative, error, logical test cases, physical test cases, UI test cases etc.
Furthermore test cases are written to keep track of testing coverage of Software. Generally, there is no formal template which is used during the test case writing. However, following are the main components which are always available and included in every test case:
  • Test case ID.
  • Product Module.
  • Product version.
  • Revision history.
  • Purpose
  • Assumptions
  • Pre-Conditions.
  • Steps.
  • Expected Outcome.
  • Actual Outcome.
  • Post Conditions.
Many Test cases can be derived from a single test scenario. In addition to this, some time it happened that multiple test cases are written for single Software which is collectively known as test suites.

Traceability Matrix

Traceability Matrix (also known as Requirement Traceability Matrix - RTM) is a table which is used to trace the requirements during the Software development life Cycle. It can be used for forward tracing (i.e. from Requirements to Design or Coding) or backward (i.e. from Coding to Requirements). There are many user defined templates for RTM.
Each requirement in the RTM document is linked with its associated test case, so that testing can be done as per the mentioned requirements. Furthermore, Bug ID is also include and linked with its associated requirements and test case. The main goals for this matrix are:
  • Make sure Software is developed as per the mentioned requirements.
  • Helps in finding the root cause of any bug.
  • Helps in tracing the developed documents during different phases of SDLC.

Posted By MIrza Abdul Hannan6:26:00 am

Software Testing Estimation Techniques

Post By: Hanan Mannan
Contact Number: Pak (+92)-321-59-95-634
-------------------------------------------------------

Software Testing Estimation Techniques

Estimating effort for test is one of the major and important tasks in SDLC. Correct estimation helps in testing the Software with maximum coverage. This section describes some of the techniques which can be useful during the estimating of effort for testing.

Functional Point Analysis

This method is based on the analysis of functional user requirements of the Software with following categories:
  • Outputs
  • Inquiries
  • Inputs
  • Internal files
  • External files

Test Point Analysis

This estimation process is used for function point analysis for Black box or Acceptance testing. It is use the main elements of this method are: Size, Productivity, Strategy, Interfacing, Complexity and Uniformity etc.

Mark-II method

It is estimation method used for analysis and measuring the estimation based on end user functional view. The procedure for Mark-II method is:
  • Determine the View Point
  • Purpose and Type of Count
  • Define the Boundary of Count
  • Identify the Logical transactions
  • Identify and Categorize Data Entity Types
  • Count the Input Data Element Types
  • Count the Functional Size

Miscellaneous

You can use other popular estimation techniques like:
  • Delphi Technique
  • Analogy Based Estimation
  • Test Case Enumeration Based Estimation
  • Task (Activity) based Estimation
  • IFPUG method

Posted By MIrza Abdul Hannan6:25:00 am

Software Testing Documentation

Post By: Hanan Mannan
Contact Number: Pak (+92)-321-59-95-634
-------------------------------------------------------

Software Testing Documentation

Testing documentation involves the documentation of artifacts which should be developed before or during the testing of Software.
Documentation for Software testing helps in estimating the testing effort required, test coverage, requirement tracking/tracing etc. This section includes the description of some commonly used documented artifacts related to Software testing such as:
  • Test Plan
  • Test Scenario
  • Test Case
  • Traceability Matrix

Test Plan

A test plan outlines the strategy that will be used to test an application, the resources that will be used, the test environment in which testing will be performed, the limitations of the testing and the schedule of testing activities. Typically the Quality Assurance Team Lead will be responsible for writing a Test Plan.
A test plan will include the following.
  • Introduction to the Test Plan document
  • Assumptions when testing the application
  • List of test cases included in Testing the application
  • List of features to be tested
  • What sort of Approach to use when testing the software
  • List of Deliverables that need to be tested
  • The resources allocated for testing the application
  • Any Risks involved during the testing process
  • A Schedule of tasks and milestones as testing is started

Test Scenario

A one line statement that tells what area in the application will be tested. Test Scenarios are used to ensure that all process flows are tested from end to end. A particular area of an application can have as little as one test scenario to a few hundred scenarios depending on the magnitude and complexity of the application.
The term test scenario and test cases are used interchangeably however the main difference being that test scenarios has several steps however test cases have a single step. When viewed from this perspective test scenarios are test cases, but they include several test cases and the sequence that they should be executed. Apart from this, each test is dependent on the output from the previous test.
Test Scenarios

Test Case

Test cases involve the set of steps, conditions and inputs which can be used while performing the testing tasks. The main intent of this activity is to ensure whether the Software Passes or Fails in terms of its functionality and other aspects. There are many types of test cases like: functional, negative, error, logical test cases, physical test cases, UI test cases etc.
Furthermore test cases are written to keep track of testing coverage of Software. Generally, there is no formal template which is used during the test case writing. However, following are the main components which are always available and included in every test case:
  • Test case ID.
  • Product Module.
  • Product version.
  • Revision history.
  • Purpose
  • Assumptions
  • Pre-Conditions.
  • Steps.
  • Expected Outcome.
  • Actual Outcome.
  • Post Conditions.
Many Test cases can be derived from a single test scenario. In addition to this, some time it happened that multiple test cases are written for single Software which is collectively known as test suites.

Traceability Matrix

Traceability Matrix (also known as Requirement Traceability Matrix - RTM) is a table which is used to trace the requirements during the Software development life Cycle. It can be used for forward tracing (i.e. from Requirements to Design or Coding) or backward (i.e. from Coding to Requirements). There are many user defined templates for RTM.
Each requirement in the RTM document is linked with its associated test case, so that testing can be done as per the mentioned requirements. Furthermore, Bug ID is also include and linked with its associated requirements and test case. The main goals for this matrix are:
  • Make sure Software is developed as per the mentioned requirements.
  • Helps in finding the root cause of any bug.
  • Helps in tracing the developed documents during different phases of SDLC.

Posted By MIrza Abdul Hannan6:23:00 am

Levels of Software Testing

Post By: Hanan Mannan
Contact Number: Pak (+92)-321-59-95-634
-------------------------------------------------------

Levels of Software Testing

There are different levels during the process of Testing. In this chapter a brief description is provided about these levels.
Levels of testing include the different methodologies that can be used while conducting Software Testing. Following are the main levels of Software Testing:
  • Functional Testing.
  • Non-Functional Testing.

Functional Testing

This is a type of black box testing that is based on the specifications of the software that is to be tested. The application is tested by providing input and then the results are examined that need to conform to the functionality it was intended for. Functional Testing of the software is conducted on a complete, integrated system to evaluate the system's compliance with its specified requirements.
There are five steps that are involved when testing an application for functionality.
StepsDescription
IThe determination of the functionality that the intended application is meant to perform.
IIThe creation of test data based on the specifications of the application.
IIIThe output based on the test data and the specifications of the application.
IVThe writing of Test Scenarios and the execution of test cases.
VThe comparison of actual and expected results based on the executed test cases.
An effective testing practice will see the above steps applied to the testing policies of every organization and hence it will make sure that the organization maintains the strictest of standards when it comes to software quality.

Unit Testing

This type of testing is performed by the developers before the setup is handed over to the testing team to formally execute the test cases. Unit testing is performed by the respective developers on the individual units of source code assigned areas. The developers use test data that is separate from the test data of the quality assurance team.
The goal of unit testing is to isolate each part of the program and show that individual parts are correct in terms of requirements and functionality.

LIMITATIONS OF UNIT TESTING

Testing cannot catch each and every bug in an application. It is impossible to evaluate every execution path in every software application. The same is the case with unit testing.
There is a limit to the number of scenarios and test data that the developer can use to verify the source code. So after he has exhausted all options there is no choice but to stop unit testing and merge the code segment with other units.

Integration Testing

The testing of combined parts of an application to determine if they function correctly together is Integration testing. There are two methods of doing Integration Testing Bottom-up Integration testing and Top Down Integration testing.
S.N.Integration Testing Method
1Bottom-up integration
This testing begins with unit testing, followed by tests of progressively higher-level combinations of units called modules or builds.
2Top-Down integration 
This testing, the highest-level modules are tested first and progressively lower-level modules are tested after that.
In a comprehensive software development environment, bottom-up testing is usually done first, followed by top-down testing. The process concludes with multiple tests of the complete application, preferably in scenarios designed to mimic those it will encounter in customers' computers, systems and network.

System Testing

This is the next level in the testing and tests the system as a whole. Once all the components are integrated, the application as a whole is tested rigorously to see that it meets Quality Standards. This type of testing is performed by a specialized testing team.
System testing is so important because of the following reasons:
  • System Testing is the first step in the Software Development Life Cycle, where the application is tested as a whole.
  • The application is tested thoroughly to verify that it meets the functional and technical specifications.
  • The application is tested in an environment which is very close to the production environment where the application will be deployed.
  • System Testing enables us to test, verify and validate both the business requirements as well as the Applications Architecture.

Regression Testing

Whenever a change in a software application is made it is quite possible that other areas within the application have been affected by this change. To verify that a fixed bug hasn't resulted in another functionality or business rule violation is Regression testing. The intent of Regression testing is to ensure that a change, such as a bug fix did not result in another fault being uncovered in the application.
Regression testing is so important because of the following reasons:
  • Minimize the gaps in testing when an application with changes made has to be tested.
  • Testing the new changes to verify that the change made did not affect any other area of the application.
  • Mitigates Risks when regression testing is performed on the application.
  • Test coverage is increased without compromising timelines.
  • Increase speed to market the product.

Acceptance Testing

This is arguably the most importance type of testing as it is conducted by the Quality Assurance Team who will gauge whether the application meets the intended specifications and satisfies the client.s requirements. The QA team will have a set of pre written scenarios and Test Cases that will be used to test the application.
More ideas will be shared about the application and more tests can be performed on it to gauge its accuracy and the reasons why the project was initiated. Acceptance tests are not only intended to point out simple spelling mistakes, cosmetic errors or Interface gaps, but also to point out any bugs in the application that will result in system crashers or major errors in the application.
By performing acceptance tests on an application the testing team will deduce how the application will perform in production. There are also legal and contractual requirements for acceptance of the system.

ALPHA TESTING

This test is the first stage of testing and will be performed amongst the teams (developer and QA teams). Unit testing, integration testing and system testing when combined are known as alpha testing. During this phase, the following will be tested in the application:
  • Spelling Mistakes
  • Broken Links
  • Cloudy Directions
  • The Application will be tested on machines with the lowest specification to test loading times and any latency problems.

BETA TESTING

This test is performed after Alpha testing has been successfully performed. In beta testing a sample of the intended audience tests the application. Beta testing is also known as pre-release testing. Beta test versions of software are ideally distributed to a wide audience on the Web, partly to give the program a "real-world" test and partly to provide a preview of the next release. In this phase the audience will be testing the following:
  • Users will install, run the application and send their feedback to the project team.
  • Typographical errors, confusing application flow, and even crashes.
  • Getting the feedback, the project team can fix the problems before releasing the software to the actual users.
  • The more issues you fix that solve real user problems, the higher the quality of your application will be.
  • Having a higher-quality application when you release to the general public will increase customer satisfaction.

Non-Functional Testing

This section is based upon the testing of the application from its non-functional attributes. Non-functional testing of Software involves testing the Software from the requirements which are non functional in nature related but important a well such as performance, security, user interface etc.
Some of the important and commonly used non-functional testing types are mentioned as follows:

Performance Testing

It is mostly used to identify any bottlenecks or performance issues rather than finding the bugs in software. There are different causes which contribute in lowering the performance of software:
  • Network delay.
  • Client side processing.
  • Database transaction processing.
  • Load balancing between servers.
  • Data rendering.
Performance testing is considered as one of the important and mandatory testing type in terms of following aspects:
  • Speed (i.e. Response Time, data rendering and accessing)
  • Capacity
  • Stability
  • Scalability
It can be either qualitative or quantitative testing activity and can be divided into different sub types such as Load testing and Stress testing.

LOAD TESTING

A process of testing the behavior of the Software by applying maximum load in terms of Software accessing and manipulating large input data. It can be done at both normal and peak load conditions. This type of testing identifies the maximum capacity of Software and its behavior at peak time.
Most of the time, Load testing is performed with the help of automated tools such as Load Runner, AppLoader, IBM Rational Performance Tester, Apache JMeter, Silk Performer, Visual Studio Load Test etc.
Virtual users (VUsers) are defined in the automated testing tool and the script is executed to verify the Load testing for the Software. The quantity of users can be increased or decreased concurrently or incrementally based upon the requirements.

STRESS TESTING

This testing type includes the testing of Software behavior under abnormal conditions. Taking away the resources, applying load beyond the actual load limit is Stress testing.
The main intent is to test the Software by applying the load to the system and taking over the resources used by the Software to identify the breaking point. This testing can be performed by testing different scenarios such as:
  • Shutdown or restart of Network ports randomly.
  • Turning the database on or off.
  • Running different processes that consume resources such as CPU, Memory, server etc.

Usability Testing

This section includes different concepts and definitions of Usability testing from Software point of view. It is a black box technique and is used to identify any error(s) and improvements in the Software by observing the users through their usage and operation.
According to Nielsen, Usability can be defined in terms of five factors i.e. Efficiency of use, Learn-ability, Memor-ability, Errors/safety, satisfaction. According to him the usability of the product will be good and the system is usable if it possesses the above factors.
Nigel Bevan and Macleod considered that Usability is the quality requirement which can be measured as the outcome of interactions with a computer system. This requirement can be fulfilled and the end user will be satisfied if the intended goals are achieved effectively with the use of proper resources.
Molich in 2000 stated that user friendly system should fulfill the following five goals i.e. Easy to Learn, Easy to Remember, Efficient to Use, Satisfactory to Use and Easy to Understand.
In addition to different definitions of usability, there are some standards and quality models and methods which define the usability in the form of attributes and sub attributes such as ISO-9126, ISO-9241-11, ISO-13407 and IEEE std.610.12 etc.

UI VS USABILITY TESTING

UI testing involves the testing of Graphical User Interface of the Software. This testing ensures that the GUI should be according to requirements in terms of color, alignment, size and other properties.
On the other hand Usability testing ensures that a good and user friendly GUI is designed and is easy to use for the end user. UI testing can be considered as a sub part of Usability testing.

Security Testing

Security testing involves the testing of Software in order to identify any flaws ad gaps from security and vulnerability point of view. Following are the main aspects which Security testing should ensure:
  • Confidentiality.
  • Integrity.
  • Authentication.
  • Availability.
  • Authorization.
  • Non-repudiation.
  • Software is secure against known and unknown vulnerabilities.
  • Software data is secure.
  • Software is according to all security regulations.
  • Input checking and validation.
  • SQL insertion attacks.
  • Injection flaws.
  • Session management issues.
  • Cross-site scripting attacks.
  • Buffer overflows vulnerabilities.
  • Directory traversal attacks.

Portability Testing

Portability testing includes the testing of Software with intend that it should be re-useable and can be moved from another Software as well. Following are the strategies that can be used for Portability testing.
  • Transferred installed Software from one computer to another.
  • Building executable (.exe) to run the Software on different platforms.
Portability testing can be considered as one of the sub parts of System testing, as this testing type includes the overall testing of Software with respect to its usage over different environments. Computer Hardware, Operating Systems and Browsers are the major focus of Portability testing. Following are some pre-conditions for Portability testing:
  • Software should be designed and coded, keeping in mind Portability Requirements.
  • Unit testing has been performed on the associated components.
  • Integration testing has been performed.
  • Test environment has been established.

Posted By MIrza Abdul Hannan6:22:00 am

Software Testing Methods

Post By: Hanan Mannan
Contact Number: Pak (+92)-321-59-95-634
-------------------------------------------------------

Software Testing Methods

There are different methods which can be use for Software testing. This chapter briefly describes those methods.

Black Box Testing

The technique of testing without having any knowledge of the interior workings of the application is Black Box testing. The tester is oblivious to the system architecture and does not have access to the source code. Typically, when performing a black box test, a tester will interact with the system's user interface by providing inputs and examining outputs without knowing how and where the inputs are worked upon.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
  • Well suited and efficient for large code segments.
  • Code Access not required.
  • Clearly separates user's perspective from the developer's perspective through visibly defined roles.
  • Large numbers of moderately skilled testers can test the application with no knowledge of implementation, programming language or operating systems.
  • Limited Coverage since only a selected number of test scenarios are actually performed.
  • Inefficient testing, due to the fact that the tester only has limited knowledge about an application.
  • Blind Coverage, since the tester cannot target specific code segments or error prone areas.
  • The test cases are difficult to design.

White Box Testing

White box testing is the detailed investigation of internal logic and structure of the code. White box testing is also called glass testing or open box testing. In order to perform white box testing on an application, the tester needs to possess knowledge of the internal working of the code.
The tester needs to have a look inside the source code and find out which unit/chunk of the code is behaving inappropriately.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
  • As the tester has knowledge of the source code, it becomes very easy to find out which type of data can help in testing the application effectively.
  • It helps in optimizing the code.
  • Extra lines of code can be removed which can bring in hidden defects.
  • Due to the tester's knowledge about the code, maximum coverage is attained during test scenario writing.
  • Due to the fact that a skilled tester is needed to perform white box testing, the costs are increased.
  • Sometimes it is impossible to look into every nook and corner to find out hidden errors that may create problems as many paths will go untested.
  • It is difficult to maintain white box testing as the use of specialized tools like code analyzers and debugging tools are required.

Grey Box Testing

Grey Box testing is a technique to test the application with limited knowledge of the internal workings of an application. In software testing, the term the more you know the better carries a lot of weight when testing an application.
Mastering the domain of a system always gives the tester an edge over someone with limited domain knowledge. Unlike black box testing, where the tester only tests the application's user interface, in grey box testing, the tester has access to design documents and the database. Having this knowledge, the tester is able to better prepare test data and test scenarios when making the test plan.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
  • Offers combined benefits of black box and white box testing wherever possible.
  • Grey box testers don't rely on the source code; instead they rely on interface definition and functional specifications.
  • Based on the limited information available, a grey box tester can design excellent test scenarios especially around communication protocols and data type handling.
  • The test is done from the point of view of the user and not the designer.
  • Since the access to source code is not available, the ability to go over the code and test coverage is limited.
  • The tests can be redundant if the software designer has already run a test case.
  • Testing every possible input stream is unrealistic because it would take an unreasonable amount of time; therefore, many program paths will go untested.

Black Box vs Grey Box vs White Box

S.N.Black Box TestingGrey Box TestingWhite Box Testing
1The Internal Workings of an application are not required to be knownSomewhat knowledge of the internal workings are knownTester has full knowledge of the Internal workings of the application
2Also known as closed box testing, data driven testing and functional testingAnother term for grey box testing is translucent testing as the tester has limited knowledge of the insides of the applicationAlso known as clear box testing, structural testing or code based testing
3Performed by end users and also by testers and developersPerformed by end users and also by testers and developersNormally done by testers and developers
4Testing is based on external expectations - Internal behavior of the application is unknownTesting is done on the basis of high level database diagrams and data flow diagramsInternal workings are fully known and the tester can design test data accordingly
5This is the least time consuming and exhaustivePartly time consuming and exhaustiveThe most exhaustive and time consuming type of testing
6Not suited to algorithm testingNot suited to algorithm testingSuited for algorithm testing
7This can only be done by trial and error methodData domains and Internal boundaries can be tested, if knownData domains and Internal boundaries can be better tested

Posted By MIrza Abdul Hannan6:21:00 am